Thursday, 8 December 2016

Reply to Atheist

Atheist to me: You are wrong.  You either did not read what the scientists say about the universe or you have not understood it.  Please read the following articles on what the scientists say about the creator.  It says sincere universe is eternal, there is no role for the creator.  



Me: You know, Prem (name changed), your gods - I mean, the scientists - are like those proverbial blind men who had tried to find out what the elephant was like.

The truth is that they do not know the whole Truth! They are just groping in the dark, thinking what they can feel with their hands to be that whole Truth. I don't blame them; they are really blind.

But, sadly, they refuse to realise their limitations. They don't realise that they're just picking up, as one of their brother scientists had once said, one or two pebbles, here and there, on the vast seashore of knowledge. They will remain blind of that vast seashore unless & until they swallow their false pride that they know everything.

Their much-lauded work - as regards origin of the universe, at least - is nothing but indulging in guessing with the limited power of their mortal, human minds, driven by their irrational and idiotic opposition to the very concept of God. That concept is anathema to them. They are not sure of what they pontifically theorise. That is why you find words like 'may have', 'appear to', being frequently used in their 'research’ papers. I don't blame them for that. They are, after all, fantasizing about what could have happened millions of years before they, poor fellows, were even born!!

And you, Prem, want me to believe in their half-baked theories, of which they are themselves not sure, to be the gospel truth!?

I think you have forwarded the 2nd of the two web pages - the one about God having no time - without bothering to read for yourself what it actually says. It seeks to disprove Hawking's grandiose claim that God had no time for creating the universe! You might have googled for it and just sent it because its title suited your atheistic view. Please read it. It debunks Hawking's theory.

Brother, time is a relative entity. For a living being like a bird or an animal - or a human being, for that matter - it begins with its birth and ends with its death. [Man is a more intelligent animal; he comes to learn, in course of time, that time extends beyond his lifespan.] And for the Universe, similarly, time began when it itself came into being and would end when it itself would come to an end. The Universe is, per se, unintelligent. If it were to express itself, time would be analogous with its own existence. Behaving like the unintelligent universe or the semi-intelligent bird or animal, the supposedly ultra-intelligent Stephen Hawking cannot think beyond the limitations of the Universe and declares - as if he knows everything - that there cannot be any time beyond the Universe. The article you sent me proves he is wrong. He has forgotten about the relative character of time.

To overcome the inconvenient notion of singularity in Einstein's theory of general relativity, scientists are now busy compiling the quantum theory wherein too they encounter some - small, per them - perturbations. Time alone will tell us whether these are really small or insurmountably big to warrant promulgation of yet another human theory.

'The cosmological terms and a radiation term', they say, keep the universe at a finite size, and therefore give it an infinite age. Finite size and infinite age are mutually incompatible terms. Only infinite size can have infinite age. The scientist community are fighting on whether the universe is finite or infinite, whether it is expanding at an accelerated rate or a constant rate, and on very many such imponderables.

And my dear Prem wants me to consider their wild guesses as gospel truths!!

Come on, friend, accept the reality! Our scientists are no better than those proverbial blind men.

Why should I believe in their hypotheses which are all motivated by their common hatred of God. They just want somehow to disprove His existence. And what will their Godless false perspective of human life give me?

It will give me freedom to do as I will! Since this worldly life would be the be-all and end-all of existence, I would like to have everything I want, by hook or by crook. I will leave no illegal and immoral stone unturned, taking care not to get ensnared in the mesh spread by the always imperfect human governance I would be under. I could always grease the palms of authorities concerned to get my need fulfilled. There would be no fool-proof monitor to observe my ill-deeds.

And why should I then not do so? I see injustices perpetrated in this world everyday. The rich are getting richer, and the poor, poorer. People with influence and money power seemingly get away scot free after committing blatant acts of oppression, suppression and corruption.

But I do not do so because I know for certain that atheism is an absolutely false premise. I know for certain that my Creator is closely monitoring all my acts of omission and commission in this world. If I do anything illegal or immoral, I may escape scrutiny by worldly authorities, but not from His scrutiny. I know for certain He will punish me either through those authorities or by any other means at His infinite command.

I may myself not get absolute justice in this world. It is a fact of this worldly life that many do not. Your atheistic platform does not provide any hope for such people. Those of them, who do not have a staunch belief in God, succumb to their utter feeling of helplessness and commit suicide or resort to terror and violence.

But those who really believe in God do not so lose their patience. They display their courage of conviction in the dictum that God is indeed in overall control of life in this world, and He is never unjust. They are convinced that life in this world is only a long-drawn-out test. God is testing them through trials and tribulations. Even if they do not seem to get full justice in this world, they are bound to get it in another world, to which mankind will get resurrected. Yes, another world! The apparent injustice prevailing in this worldly life is a definite pointer to that other world, where everyone is scheduled to get full justice. Mankind could not have been created to suffer injustice. While this world of tests is only of short duration, the other world is everlasting. Wise men do not sacrifice everlasting happiness there for a very limited and dubious happiness in this world.

For you, Prem, this other world is nothing but mere fantasy, indulged in by prehistoric ancient people. I won't blame you. Your gods, the scientists, have rubbished the very idea of mankind being resuscitated in another world, although science has given us a definite pointer to that possibility when man has been able to clone an animal. Given their cultivated hatred for God, the scientists are, of course, liable to ignore any such pointers. In fact, that other world is beyond human intellect however bright it may be.

That is why the all-knowing Creator had been sending His human Messengers one after another, till mankind reached its historic age, to inculcate in them the need for and the reality of the other world. Their divine Messages are recorded in the holy Scriptures of various religions. I have not studied the other Scriptures, but I have studied the Qur'aan, the last of those divine Messages.

And the Qur'aan contains many evidences of its being divine, and not man-made. It gives me the badly needed moral support to lead my life in this rather harsh world. Your gods, the scientists, cannot give me that support.

Mohammad Shafi
Friday, the 9th of December, 2016

No comments:

Post a Comment